Threat Intelligence & APT Dark Reading 1 month ago

ClickFix Campaign Compromises 31 Orgs, Abuses Polygon Blockchain

CN
CyberNew Threat Research Desk
• Original Reporting: Dark Reading
CyberNew Threat Intel Assessment
Assessed Severity: CRITICAL
Impacted Surface
Enterprise Perimeter & Network Defense
Intelligence Sector
Threat Intelligence & APT

Analyst Takeaway

"Attackers have compromised at least 31 organizations through a ClickFix campaign that abuses the Polygon blockchain technology in a technique known as "EtherHiding" to obscure and automate its malicious activity. The campaign already has attacked the websites of various organizations, including businesses in e-commerce, professional services, and retail logistics, according to a report released..."

Recommended Defense & Mitigation

  • Emergency Patching: Prioritize vendor patches and CVE mitigation across internet-facing assets immediately.
  • Perimeter Audit: Inspect perimeter firewall logs and hunt for unauthorized RCE indicators.
Curated & Verified by CyberNew Threat Intelligence Desk Standard Defense Framework (NIST / MITRE ATT&CK)

Attackers have compromised at least 31 organizations through a ClickFix campaign that abuses the Polygon blockchain technology in a technique known as "EtherHiding" to obscure and automate its malicious activity.

The campaign already has attacked the websites of various organizations, including businesses in e-commerce, professional services, and retail logistics, according to a report released today by GuidePoint Security’s Research and Intelligence Team (GRIT). The report is based on GRIT's findings on blockchain forensics, incident-response evidence, and analysis of the malware’s source code.

The attack uses a technique that emerged several years ago called EtherHiding, which abuses blockchain technology to cover up malicious activity. In this case, the attackers use the Polygon cryptocurrency blockchain — a permanent, distributed ledger — to dynamically update their command-and-control (C2) servers rather than use a fixed C2 server address, which is more easily detected and blocked.

Related:'NovaCookies' Kit Steals Microsoft 365 Sessions for $320 a Month

"Because it allows for ad hoc adjustment of C2 details at scale, blocking a singular domain or IP address alone does not permanently sever attacker access," Jean-Pierre Mouton, senior threat intelligence consultant for GuidePoint, wrote in the report. "For fractions of a cent per transaction, the attacker can redirect every infected machine to a new C2 server automatically."

This differs from most ClickFix campaigns, in which an infostealer is deployed on the victim's system that can be neutralized by blocking the attacker’s C2 server, cutting off communications with infected machines, he said.

ClickFix with Some Twists

Source Verification & Original Intelligence

This threat report was reviewed by CyberNew analysts and cross-referenced with primary security disclosures from Dark Reading.

Primary Advisory →